Log in

No account? Create an account
Books read, late October. - Barnstorming on an Invisible Segway [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Marissa Lingen

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Books read, late October. [Nov. 1st, 2013|12:33 pm]
Marissa Lingen

It was an epic fortnight for bouncing off library books. Epic.

John David Anderson, Sidekicked. On a page to page level, I found this book engaging and enjoyable. After twenty pages, I had put it on my Christmas shopping ideas list. By the time I finished, it was thoroughly off again. It is 2013, and this book made me blurt, snarl, and snap, “WHAT YEAR IS IT?” so many, many, many times in more than one direction. If you want the full version, ask on e-mail. Short version is: I was incredibly disappointed because Anderson is, as I said, very readable, clearly talented, and I wanted to like this book. And not only no but hell no.

Rae Carson, The Bitter Kingdom. A fitting end to this trilogy. I am usually a fan of reading series in order–and I am here too!–but I feel like Rae clued readers in enough on what had gone before that while someone starting here wouldn’t get the full emotional arc, they would have no trouble orienting themselves not just in the world but in the characters’ personal lives. So by all means get Girl of Fire and Thorns first if you can find it, but if you can’t, go ahead with this one. The backstory is cool, the characters are compelling, and the crucial moment with the godstone was simultaneously surprising and just right. I enjoyed this very much and will be eager to see what Rae gets up to next.

Linda Colley, The Ordeal of Elizabeth Marsh: A Woman in World History. One of the worst titles I have ever run across. Ever. “A Woman in World History,” seriously, publishers, what female-identified persons does that leave out? Most people will not recognize Elizabeth Marsh’s name except for being able to identify it as likely female, and the subtitle gives you nothing. Marsh was an eighteenth-century subject of the British Empire, and her travails took her all over the world–the Caribbean, the Mediterranean, a surprising lot of Africa, England, India, South America, lots of places. And she was remarkably ordinary, aside from that. Interesting stuff, more for people who like travel narratives and/or the eighteenth century than a general recommendation.

James S. A. Corey, Abaddon’s Gate. Last in the trilogy, with blessedly few vomit zombies to be seen, or at least seen as vomit zombies. (They might be classified as vomit zombie ghosts, but no one calls them that.) Considering how little I liked the premise and the first book, I’m glad Mark and Jo got me to read the other two, but really I’d mostly rather the authors focused on other things. I did like that the Methodist pastor in space actually acted like a Methodist pastor in space; it was a type of religious belief and practice that is not at all common in SF despite being pretty darn common in the real world.

Antonio Garrido, The Corpse Reader. Translation of a Spanish-language historical novel set in China, about the father of Chinese forensic science. Generally a fun read, with added interest for watching how a Spanish writer focuses on slightly different aspects of that era of Chinese history than English writers generally do. Not really a genre murder mystery per se, but probably should be shelved with them, since it has similar concerns.

Jonathan Grimwood, The Last Banquet. This is the Sooper Seekrit Soodonym of Jon Courtenay Grimwood as he makes a foray into straight-up non-speculative historical fiction. My alternate title for it was The French Nobility: Boring When Not Disgusting (Often Both). If that appeals to you, onwards. As for me, I will be hoping that Mr. Grimwood spends more time back on the speculative side of the aisle, even though I love historical fiction and need more of it.

Jan Guillou, The Templar Knight. Swedish historical novel of the twelfth century. This has a Birkebeiner! And evil nuns and good nuns and Templars and Hospitallers and smiting and weaving. Second in its series, but should stand alone reasonably well. Exemplar of the idea that Scandinavian literature becomes 1000% less depressing once smiting enters the picture. Looking forward to the last in this series, and I definitely see why it’s been popular in Sweden.

David I. Kertzer, The Kidnapping of Edgardo Mortara. This book was horrifying. It was not particularly well-organized and kept going back and forth, but the historical events it was covering were horrifying enough to keep it compelling. Basically in the 19th century there were several Jewish children (including the titular kid) who were legally kidnapped by Italian Catholic government(s) (this was the confusing unification period and interrelated there, although Kertzer did not make the interrelations as clear as he hoped) because there was even a rumor that a Christian servant had baptized the kid. It was awful. The titular character was six, and he never entirely reconciled with his poor family even as an adult.

Scott Lynch, The Republic of Thieves. This book is structured in two timelines, a fairly distant past within the characters’ lives and the present of the series to date. I liked both timelines, which is rare for me, and I very much liked that the subtitle of this book could in some ways be Locke Lamora Gets Called On His Bullshit. Looking forward to more. Recommended.

Craig M. Mullaney, The Unforgiving Minute: A Soldier’s Education. A thoughtful and detailed memoir of a young US Army officer’s training and deployment. It was more thoughtful and detailed on the training end of things than the deployment end, and I really wish there had been more about his post-Army life, but given the timing he really hadn’t had a lot of chance to process those things yet. I will be interested to see if he writes another memoir about becoming a civilian, though.

Chaim Potok, The Chosen. Interwoven stories of two young men who are friends and their relationships with their fathers, set in an American Orthodox Jewish community in the mid-40s into 1950. It was a beautiful book, and it did what SF readers often complain that mainstream fiction does not do: it put large-scale social change vividly into a very personal individual context. (Mainstream fiction doesn’t always do this, but SF doesn’t always do it either, so…I think we should all give that particular complaint a rest, frankly.)

Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö, The Fire Engine That Disappeared. Yes, those of you who are paying attention to the rules just noticed that’s two Swedish novels not just in one month but in one fortnight. Oops. The Templar Knight came in at the library sooner than I thought, and then there was the epic set of bounces off other library books, so…yeah. Anyway, this is another in their mystery series, and the title strikes me as unfortunate because it’s pointing in neon to one of the important clues. Ah well. That’s all of them the library has, I think.

Dan Snow, Death or Victory: The Battle of Quebec and the Birth of an Empire. This book is very very very much about the Battle of Quebec and very very very little about the birth of an empire. Judge your interest levels accordingly.

G. Willow Wilson, Alif the Unseen. One of the things I love about this book is that it was present or very near future–the setting was not at all out of line for one of Cory Doctorow’s novels that get classified as near-future SF. And it was tech-savvy along those lines, albeit in a very different (Muslim) cultural matrix. However, it was fantasy also! This is good! I see no reason why the future (near or far!) can’t have fantasies in it. I wish I saw more of that. Also Wilson’s handling of “the convert” showed a sophisticated self-awareness I wish I saw more of in whatever kind of fiction. More please.

Originally published at Novel Gazing Redux


From: athenais
2013-11-01 05:43 pm (UTC)
I loved Alif the Unseen. I was surprised it wasn't up for a Hugo. Well, maybe not surprised, but very disappointed.

Birkebeiners! I am looking into the Jan Guillou, in that case.

Still vaguely unsatisfied by The Republic of Thieves, but very fond of that series. And I did enjoy it, I just wanted it to be more this and not quite as much that.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: markgritter
2013-11-01 08:44 pm (UTC)
I thought the political skulduggery got short shrift in RoT. Locke and Jean were getting thoroughly beat in the dirty-tricks department, but they somehow score a near-tie? It felt like the "one clever trick" was played up way too much.

And no mention was made of trying to mess with the vote counting itself, which is the best way to rig an election. There were just a couple references to the election judge being unimpeachable, etc., but not that she couldn't be fooled.

More voting fraud, less smooching!

(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: athenais
2013-11-03 06:27 am (UTC)
I totally agree. I thought there would be quite a lot more ignoring of the "rules" and much dirtier politics. I definitely didn't see the vote going the way it went. I wonder what book he was going to write ten years ago? I'm not sure it was this one.

I didn't mind jumping between timelines, but I thought it slowed the pace to the point of thinking, "Oh, well, I can put this down for a bit, it's only going to be smooching."
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: jeditrilobite
2013-11-01 05:58 pm (UTC)
FYI, Abbadon's Gate isn't the end of a trilogy: there's three more books planned in the series.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: fadethecat
2013-11-01 06:03 pm (UTC)
When I was in high school, I read The Chosen almost by accident--I think the cover and back blurb managed to convince me it was subtle supernatural fantasy, and by the time I realized otherwise I was hooked--and my goodness, I loved it. It was a look into a part of the world and set of changes in history that I had never encountered elsewhere. (Which says a lot about how sheltered that environment was, given I was in high school and did not know a damn about those things. But anyway.) I found the sequel (sequels?) a bit more hit-or-miss, but still worth reading.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mrissa
2013-11-01 07:20 pm (UTC)
I have put the sequel on my library list, so I'm glad to hear you enjoyed it.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ethelmay
2013-11-01 10:55 pm (UTC)
Similar story here. For a long time Potok's novels were my main source of information about Judaism. After a while his style started to wear on me and I stopped reading him, but I still count The Chosen as formative. There was a film version that I remember as pretty good.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: sheff_dogs
2013-11-01 08:21 pm (UTC)
I've not read any Dan Snow, but his television work started with battlefields.
(Reply) (Thread)
From: diatryma
2013-11-02 02:36 am (UTC)
What really impressed me with The Bitter Kingdom was how much the trilogy ended up being about something else. The information the characters learn throughout the books expands the world instead of only the plot or the scale of the explosions.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mrissa
2013-11-02 12:48 pm (UTC)
Yeah, that was really lovely.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: vcmw
2013-11-02 01:00 pm (UTC)
My favorite thing about the Ordeal of Elizabeth Marsh was just how much she did travel around. Narratives from that time period have been helping me get a better sense of how mobile it was possible to be then.

Your alternate title for Republic of Thieves increases the amount I look forward to reading it by a substantial margin.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: sprrwhwk
2013-11-02 08:09 pm (UTC)
I did like that the Methodist pastor in space actually acted like a Methodist pastor in space; it was a type of religious belief and practice that is not at all common in SF despite being pretty darn common in the real world.

Ooh! This is a bit I would like to see more of in SF too. It doesn't sound like it's necessarily worth reading the whole trilogy just for this bit, but I'm glad that it's there nonetheless.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: between4walls
2013-11-03 09:11 pm (UTC)
It was a relief when John XXIII got paired with John Paul II for sainthood rather than Pius IX (the previous "balance both sides" had been beatifying John XXIII and Pius IX at the same time, and I thought they would make him a saint.)

Because of this book, the Edgardo Mortara case is what tends to be common knowledge about him among English-speakers, but it's just the tip of the iceberg of a pretty awful individual/political figure, as I'm sure the other Kretzer book detailed. The good side to the uncompromising attitude of Pius IX during unification is that it forced Italy to become more secular.

Edited at 2013-11-03 09:47 pm (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: mrissa
2013-11-04 12:08 am (UTC)
My default mental reaction to Pius IX is...silly.

I am mostly used to seeing him referred to in French, so I think of him as Pie-9, and that is why Victor Emmanuel wanted to wall him up in the Vatican: so he did not turn the world into Pie.

Possibly reading as much Vonnegut as I did at a formative age is not purely a good thing.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: ethelmay
2013-11-04 06:08 am (UTC)
If all the world were apple Pie...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)