Marissa Lingen (mrissa) wrote,
Marissa Lingen
mrissa

Question of the day, #2

One of the recent issues of New Scientist had an impassioned plea for adding a biology Nobel Prize. What do you think of this? More generally, when do you think it's the right idea to expand an existing prize and when is it better to come up with a new prize? And how much should determining the intent of the originator of the prize matter?
Tags: random questions
Subscribe

  • The end of an era

    I just made my blog cross-post to dreamwidth rather than to livejournal. That's how it's going to go from here on out, so if you want to read my…

  • So here is what

    It looks like people who cut their teeth on lj are pretty attached to this style of aggregator for their reading. So I'm going to look into getting…

  • Sooooo the livejournal thing

    Like many of you, I do not intend to follow Russian law regarding what minors can and cannot read about, nor do I feel that having an "adult content"…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    switch
    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Help
  • 13 comments

  • The end of an era

    I just made my blog cross-post to dreamwidth rather than to livejournal. That's how it's going to go from here on out, so if you want to read my…

  • So here is what

    It looks like people who cut their teeth on lj are pretty attached to this style of aggregator for their reading. So I'm going to look into getting…

  • Sooooo the livejournal thing

    Like many of you, I do not intend to follow Russian law regarding what minors can and cannot read about, nor do I feel that having an "adult content"…