That sounds like a conversation my husband and younger son would have.
It's a muffin if it has milk in it. Cakelings and cupcakes don't have milk.
(I never understood that joke about how Muffin the Mule
is a criminal offence in several states...)
My chocolate cupcakes have milk in them. I can't tell from here whether we just plain disagree here or whether you wouldn't know mine had milk in them from biting into one. I suppose we can try an experiment sometime if you like, with a double-blind and like that. Science applied to chocolate is good science.
If it had milk in, I'd call it a muffin. But I doubt I could tell. It's just a reasonable place to draw an arbitrary line.
Ah, I see.
Well, this makes it easier for me to tell myself that I should not set up an elaborate muffin/cupcake distinguishing session for 4th St. Because really I have other things I could do with that energy, but on the other hand...muffins! Cupcakes!
I suspect it has to do with "muffing"; "muff" is American slang for the female genitals and there are a number of expressions that use the word.
This all sounds to me perfectly appropriate for Nonsense Day
We are occasionally nonsensical but mostly merely obscure.
<3 you two.
Now I'm picturing some sort of icing filled pastry that jumps energetically out of a toaster, but with muffin/cupcake consistency rather than flakiness. Of course, for it to work in a toaster means that it's not particularly muffin/cupcake shaped, but neither is a half kangaroo.
True, it's hard to argue that something is half kangaroo in a half that has nothing to do with its shape, particularly when someone has already brought up the pocket.
The kangaroos were Janet Kagan's fault.